5.30.2006

in lieu of an actual post

moving, boxes, heartless ivy-league fascists


another overheard appropriate to my eleventh hour packing:

Female student: Do you guys have any empty boxes that I could possibly have?
Clerk: No, I'm sorry.
Female student: What about all of those empty boxes over there?
Clerk: We sell boxes, so we're not allowed to give out boxes for free.
Female student: Okay. How much are the boxes you're selling?
Clerk: Actually, we're sold out.
Female student: Okay, if you don't have any more boxes for sale, can I have some of those empty boxes over there?
Clerk: No.

--Columbia University Bookstore, 115th & Broadway

5.24.2006

no sleep til'

brooklyn, ncs debauchery, columbia j-school debauchery


I've been a little frantic with packing up all my useless shit for the impending move to Brooklyn, not to mention the quick sojourn to Chicago for the annual National Cartoonists Society Weekend of Debauchery, so I haven't been keeping up on my responsibility to you, kind public, in providing a blow by blow (ha-ha) of the Semi-Official Annihilation Method Reveal. No cause for concern, kids, I'll get on that right away -- I swear! -- but in the mean time, please enjoy the best 'Overheard in New York' I've seen in a long, long while (and I can guarantee you it's all true - that's how we do [did!] it at j-school):

Guy: I said to myself 'he's never going to make it': he's a drug freak, he has three STDs. But you proved me wrong, my friend.

--Columbia Journalism School Graduation Reception

5.20.2006

neil strauss wants to game me; i reluctantly accept

the misogynist game, naked swedish 10s, the annihilation scam


So being the worldly young master of science that I am, I signed up for Neil Strauss' ("The Game") mailing list a few weeks ago to keep updated on the goings-on of the male pick-up artist community. I figured, perhaps naively and perhaps underestimating my own worldliness, that I need to know these things to protect myself on the rare occasions that I might actually leave my apartment. And plus, I find this PUA world quite interesting. I find "The Game" far less hateful than "The Rules," but it's still frightening that women (girls, that is) fall for this my-friend's-wallaby back-handed compliment crap - but I guess that's why I'm a girl-hating feminist. Then again, their behavior is just a creation of the male hegemony. (Though according to Nick Sylvester's lies, New York women are too smart for the Game! The Village Voice's shoddy editing has set us back to the mid '90s! But I digress.)

So far Neil Strauss has continually irritated me with his self-aggrandizing e-mails: handle "manofstyle," and last week's installment detailed how he "accidentally" took a Swedish super-model-type up to his room and "accidentally" got her naked. He got this "10" Swedish chick by using the "Annihilation Method," complete with "Black Mirror Technique." Strauss claims that he is one of only six men in the world who know the Annihilation Method (complete with Black Mirror Technique) - but now, he says, he's ready to share it with "a select few" culled from his e-mail list of more than 23,000.

And today Neil Strauss chose me. Tomorrow afternoon, he says, he'll send me an e-mail with a link to a web site that will lay out the Annihilation Method in great detail.

"My assistant is a techno-superman. He has installed some sort of code on my web site that tells exactly how many people are going there. As you know, I'm not inviting everyone to listen in on this. So - if I see that MORE people go to the site than I actually invited, I'll know that someone leaked it out. And if that happens, I'll delete the web page.

So please, Susie ...don't share this with anyone."

I'll admit, I was pretty excited. But now I feel a little dirty and complicit, being so willfully let in on this gross secret, this plan to dominate my (hotter, stupider) peers. And it seems, to me at least, to beg the question: where are the women who want to play, rather than always getting played? Are they all like those hideous Rules women, hell-bent on getting married and having babies? (Rule #7: "Close the deal - Rules women do not date for more than two years.") Can men just not stand the idea of getting played, of not having the power in a relationship? Are the Rules women right to always give the man the upper hand, to exert their power only by withholding sex? Do women really only care about goddamn babies?!

Until I complete the spiral downward into the ninth circle of utter despair over this gender inequality, I'll perhaps propel myself even further by studying the Annihilation Method - while finishing up Are Men Necessary?, of course.

5.09.2006

no love boat

columbia j-school, liquor, lies



http://www.gawker.com/news/columbia-journalism-school/columbia-jschool-teaches-its-kids-to-drink-172573.php

It's true, it's all true. All events "open to the public" on campus have free alcohol. And at the beginning of the schoolyear, in August, they promised us this last party would have free alcohol. Lies and lying liars. I guess that's what we get from a school that for all intents and purposes is inexplicably run by Newsday.

I said it before and I'll say it again: new T-shirts.

"no education, no money, no future"

or the other favorite.

"Columbia Graduate School of Journalism: It doesn't have to be good." Plus now we could add "Or true."

Sweet.

5.03.2006

a brainbreaking work of staggering procrastination

dave eggers, judith crist, over-inflated egos


I edited this in literally ten (10) minutes. It's not like J.C. knows who Eggers is anyway. And it's not like I care!


Manic-depressive, narcissistic and messy as hell: Dave Eggers, the author of the memoir A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius (’01), has used this self-important style consistently throughout his different works, though it appears in varying degrees of intensity, in proportion to the length of his stories; the longer they get, the more he digs in, until he’s burrowing under your skin and scratching his name in the bone.
Eggers is always either soaring or wallowing. It’s exhausting, all this bouncing between extremes with little if anything in between; it’s just like a real life manic-depressive friend off their meds, needy and cloying. Its his own brand of what some critics have coined “hyperactive realism”: He loves and lives life to its fullest, from hunger and desire to glorious athleticism and physical movement to his over-detailed and often beautiful physical descriptions.
He chews over the beauty of life in long passages saturated in color and sensation. Everything is warm or cold, loud or quiet, “sad and sickly or glamorous and new” (AHWOSG). Everything is intense and there is little, if any, middle ground. One moment he’s sure that he and his brother Toph could escape from their car were they to careen off a cliff on Highway 1, and the next he can’t leave Toph home alone without being obsessed with visions of his brother’s death.

Out the door, down the steps and into the car and as I’m backing out of the driveway there is the usual euphoria –
Free!
– which pretty much overtakes me. Often I laugh out loud, giggle, bang the steering wheel a few times, grinning, put the right tape in the stereo – This time lasts for ten, twelve seconds. Then, at the moment that I am turning the corner, I become convinced, in a flash of pure truth-seeing –it happens every time – that Toph will be killed. (AHWOSG)

Eggers starts this scene off proud of himself for getting out of the house, and ends up fantasizing about all the gory details of Toph’s death (“handcuffs, floorboards, clown suits, leather, videotape, duct tape, knives, bathtubs, refrigerators”) and wallowing in his guilt and self-loathing.
Eggers’ protracted thoughts on death and violence are just as obsessive in their language and extremity as his happier visions. In one of the stories from his collection How We Are Hungry (’05), he describes the short life of a somewhat maniacal dog. This is how the fast dog introduces himself to the reader:

Oh I’m a fast dog. I’m fast-fast. It’s true and I love being fast I admit it I love it. You know fast dogs. Dogs that just run by and you say, Damn! That’s a fast dog! Well that’s me. A fast dog. I’m a fast fast dog. Hooooo! Hoooooooo!

This story is titled After I was Thrown in the River and Before I Drowned, and in the end, the loveable, arrogant fast fast dog dies in this river, dirty and alone.
Death lurks from the beginning of Eggers’ first novel, You Shall Know Our Velocity! (’03): on the very first page, the reader is told that the principal character Will is already dead. In one of Will’s post-mortem flashbacks, he, Hand and Jack, the main Velocity! Characters, are riding high after a successful junior high school dance, complete with making out and light petting. To celebrate, they go to a farm, douse a cow in gasoline and burn it alive “with total detachment.” Fifteen years later, Will is still consumed by his guilt over the dead cow. Sometimes this earnest brooding can be amusing, such as the first couple times Eggers fantasizes about his brother’s death (not the second dozen) but it usually just stumbles along, puffed up and unwieldy.
Eggers and his narrators speak of this desire and depression directly to the reader. “Please look. Can you see us? Can you see us, in our little red car?” he pleads with his reader (AHWOSG). Can you see him? Do you feel sorry for him yet? And do you like the book? He’s writing it for you, you know.
Eggers’ work isn’t intolerable without exception. In his short story The Only Meaning of the Oil-Wet Water, Eggers periodically interrupts the story to humorously deconstruct his work for the reader, in “There is almost no sadness in this story,” “This story is not about Pilar and Hand falling in love,” and “The horses had no symbolic value” – there’s just a few too many of these proclamations. In You Shall Know Our Velocity!, Hand explains to the reader that “on the surface this story is ludicrous and all of its terms are absurd.” And if you were wondering, as Eggers is sure you were, “the pig symbolizes nothing,” just like those horses.
Eggers’ dialogue often feels authentic, and his quirky metaphors and similes can be charming, such as when he and Toph “lose weeks like buttons, like pencils” (AHWOSG). These are diamonds in the very rough, and partly redeem the otherwise rambling, self-important and affected. Most of Eggers’ writing feels like a messy notebook that hasn’t been edited or even proofread. This aesthetic can be great in small doses, but it’s difficult to not get sick of it after a while, the constant ups and downs, the narcissism, the need to be innovative and new, even if it means using cheap and easy gimmicks. These tricks might compelling if they were one in a dozen pages, but Eggers over salts his writing until it’s bloated with tricks – drawings, diagrams (AHWOSG), photographs and scanned notes (Velocity!). They’re not incorporated enough to sustain interest beyond their novelty, but they cloud and distract from Eggers’ good moments. Eggers would be wise to work shorter, and have the guts to edit his stream of self-conscious down to its best.